Sacks’ prediction was that Democrats would fare poorly in the November 2022 elections, especially relative to expectations, and that the situation in early 2022 “does not bode well for the Democrats in November.”

What actually happened:

• Pre‑election expectations: Many forecasters and betting markets anticipated a strong Republican showing or “red wave,” with Republicans favored to win clear control of the House and a majority in the Senate. For example, one forecast predicted Republicans would end up with 219 House seats and 51 Senate seats, flipping both chambers, and analysts widely cited structural factors and the economy as favoring the GOP. (harvardpolitics.com)
• Actual results: In the 2022 midterms, Democrats held the U.S. Senate and gained a seat (net +1), while Republicans took the House by a very narrow margin (net GOP gain of 9 seats, far below historical midterm losses for a president’s party). Democrats also achieved a net gain of governorships and flipped multiple state legislative chambers, leading many analysts to describe the outcome as historically good for an incumbent president’s party and far better than expected. (en.wikipedia.org)
• Relative to expectations: Post‑election coverage across the political spectrum emphasized that the anticipated “red wave” failed to materialize and that Democrats exceeded expectations, with outlets explicitly using those phrases. (ussc.edu.au)

Because Democrats performed better than most public expectations—especially in the Senate and in state‑level races—rather than suffering a broad, expectation‑defying defeat, Sacks’ prediction about Democrats doing poorly in November 2022 is best classified as wrong.