Last updated Nov 29, 2025
Jason @ 00:23:17Inconclusive
governmentmarkets
(1) The DOJ–Apple antitrust dispute over the five listed practice categories will culminate in a settlement where Apple concedes on roughly three of the five areas; (2) The net effect of the settlement will be positive for consumers (e.g., more interoperability/lower restrictions); and (3) The outcome will not seriously damage Apple’s long‑term business performance, making Apple stock an attractive long‑term investment despite the case.
So anyway, I think three out of five of these get settled and it'll be good for consumers. Ultimately I would not financial advice, but I think that Apple is going to be able to manage this. I'd buy the stock. I may buy more of the stock. I think that this will be good for them long term.View on YouTube
Explanation

As of November 30, 2025, the DOJ’s 2024 antitrust case against Apple over iPhone-related practices is still in active litigation with no settlement or final remedy yet.

  • The DOJ and multiple states filed the lawsuit in March 2024, alleging Apple maintained a smartphone monopoly via five categories of conduct (super apps, cloud gaming, messaging, smartwatches, and digital wallets/NFC). (techcrunch.com)
  • In June 2025, Judge Julien Neals denied Apple’s motion to dismiss, allowing the case to move forward into discovery and a likely multi‑year process; reports note the case is unlikely to reach trial before roughly 2028. (macrumors.com)
  • Contemporary analyses of the suit have consistently described expected resolution timelines of 3–5 years, reinforcing that we are still early in the process. (techcrunch.com)
  • Recent coverage in mid‑ to late‑2025 discusses Apple’s answer to the complaint and additional states joining the case, framing it as ongoing litigation, not a settled matter. (macrumors.com)

Apple has independently loosened some restrictions (e.g., on cloud streaming, RCS messaging support, and NFC access for third‑party wallets), which arguably benefits consumers, but these changes are not yet part of any DOJ settlement or consent decree in this case. (macrumors.com)

Because:

  1. There is no settlement yet, so we cannot know whether “three of five” categories will be formally conceded;
  2. The net consumer impact of any eventual remedy is unknown; and
  3. The long‑term effect of that eventual outcome on Apple’s business and stock cannot be tied to a resolved case,

there isn’t enough information to judge whether Jason’s multi‑part prediction has come true. It remains too early to call, so the prediction is best classified as inconclusive at this time.