Jason predicted that within roughly 3–5 years from February 17, 2023, AI ethics and bias would become an active agenda item for politicians and the subject of government attention or action.

By late 2025, this has clearly already happened at multiple levels of government:

• In October 2022 (even before the prediction), the White House released the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, centered on protections against algorithmic discrimination, data privacy, and other civil-rights-focused AI principles, explicitly intended to guide policy and regulation. (bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov)
• On October 30, 2023, President Biden signed Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI, directing federal agencies to address AI risks including civil rights harms, discrimination, and consumer protection, making AI ethics and bias a core federal policy agenda. (en.wikipedia.org)
• The U.S. AI Safety Institute was created within NIST in November 2023, with an AI Safety Institute Consortium established in 2024, to operationalize safe and responsible AI practices for government and industry. (en.wikipedia.org)
• The EU’s 2024 Artificial Intelligence Act establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI, explicitly tied to protecting fundamental rights and addressing high‑risk and biased AI systems, showing another major political jurisdiction legislating around AI ethics and algorithmic bias. (en.wikipedia.org)
• In the U.S., California’s AI bills (the 2024 Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Models Act, SB 1047, and the 2025 Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, SB‑53) focus on AI safety, catastrophic risk, and accountability, reflecting sustained legislative attention to responsible AI. (en.wikipedia.org)
• Under President Trump in 2025, Executive Order 14179 and the Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government order explicitly target perceived ideological and DEI‑related bias in AI systems, making AI bias a prominent partisan and policy issue. (en.wikipedia.org)

These actions involve presidents, national legislatures, and state lawmakers, and they squarely concern AI ethics, discrimination, and bias. Because such government attention and concrete policy measures arrived well within (and in fact earlier than) the 3–5‑year window Jason named, the prediction that AI ethics and bias would become an active political agenda item is best scored as right.