The prediction is about an eventual state of consumer technology (“in some period of time”) with no specific deadline. To judge it as right or wrong, we would need either:

1. Clear evidence that, by now, ordinary consumers routinely have fully personalized movies or video games generated on the fly by AI, tailored to each individual; or
2. A passed deadline after which the prediction can be said to have failed.

As of November 30, 2025, neither condition is met:

• There are emerging tools and research demos for AI‑generated video and interactive experiences (e.g., model-based video generation and experimental AI-driven game content), but these are far from a mainstream, routine consumer experience where “we all have our own movie or video game” automatically generated for us as a normal part of entertainment consumption.
• Major consumer platforms (e.g., Netflix, gaming consoles, app stores) still predominantly distribute pre-authored movies and games. While recommendation algorithms personalize which content you see, they do not yet generate full-length, bespoke movies or full games from scratch for each user as a standard product offering.
• Because the predictor did not specify a timeframe (no year or bound like “within 5–10 years”), the fact that this outcome has not yet occurred by 2025 does not logically falsify the prediction; it could still happen later.

Given that (a) the predicted scenario has not yet materialized at scale, but (b) no time limit was given, the correct classification as of now is that it’s too early to determine whether the prediction will ultimately be right or wrong.